Whereas when something streaming-exclusive is removed from whatever platform, you typically have no choice but to accept that it is gone or rely on piracy. Pair that with backups and something capable of correcting corruption, like ZFS, and you’ve got incredibly long-term access to the media that you own. It’s “easy” for general consumers with $50 to burn on an LG WH14NS40, or similar, to backup decrypted copies of even UHD Blu-rays and then stream them locally with something like Plex, Jellyfin or Kodi. I disagree about it being “not much better” with Blu-ray, even without SGX, you can still rely on software like AnyDVD, MakeMKV, DVDFab, etc., to clone and decrypt the media. In any case, the Blue-Rays sitting on your shelf aren't much better than some streaming service. Sometimes I wonder if this urge to preserve is patently ridiculous and we should learn to just. For now next to them I store a disk image of an OS (old debian+Firefox+Adobe Flash) that can play them - who knows how long that will keep working on future hardware? swf files, of which I only managed to convert a subset to video files (where applicable) so far. I learned this the hard way with my library of. This stuff can go incredibly quickly and it will become harder every year to salvage anything. Preferably decentralized with multiple backups (Torrent?). If you want to preserve something long term, the very first thing you should do is strip any DRM, then save it as a "dumb" format on long-term storage. The time range "20-50 years" is often thrown around. Some can become unreadable after a much shorter time. This may be accelerated by such software becoming even more illegal to create and use.Īdditionally these kinds of discs physically degrade within about fifty years tops. In maybe another 5 years it will become an ordeal to get software that can bypass the DRM working on a recent system with whatever Blue-Ray drive you could scrounge up. > No streaming service will guarantee you endless future access to a particular videoĪpparently neither do Blue-Rays, since about 10 years from now hardware that will read them will become scarce. Yes, they have similar purposes, but they are not interchangeable. What's worse, that fraudulent misuse of the word "buy" confuses some people into mistakenly thinking that disks (like Blue-Rays and DVDs) can be replaced by streaming services. I think it's fraudulent for vendors to say that you "buy" a video when you don't get to keep it permanently, but it does happen. Of course, I could always go to a pirate site and get access to practically everything, but while that's probably more convenient, I'm trying to do things legally. The show may not be on any streaming service available to me at a particular point in time. Not a random show that may or may not be on a streaming service I'm paying for. When I want to watch the a particular show, I want to watch that. So while that's an option that should exist, in practice it usually doesn't, so disks are the only thing legally available for those who want continuous access. Buying and downloading a file would also work in theory, but in most cases you can't legally buy a video file, you can only lease video files for a specific device for a finite indefinite time. No streaming service will guarantee you endless future access to a particular video, and that makes them distinctly different. However, if you want to watch a particular movie/show repeatedly, then you want a Blue-Ray or DVD, not a streaming service. If you just "want to watch something" but don't care exactly what it is, a streaming service is great. I pay for a number of streaming services, and yet every month things I used to be able to see have disappeared from those services. The key distinction is that specific videos disappear from streaming services at any time - there are no guarantees. Blue-Rays and DVDs aren't replaceable by streaming services.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |